Posts tagged Blogging

The Art of Not Giving a Shit

That is a shit not given.I’ll be honest – I’m not sure that “not giving a shit” can actually be called an art form, but if that possibility exists, I’m getting in on the ground floor, and throwing my hat into the ring to be nominated for vice president.

(Not president, because I’m sure some dude gives less shit than I do, and I think he was working at Taco Bell last weekend. I mean, come on dude!)

I know I’ve come on here time and time again and talked about doing different shit, and apologizing for not updating enough, born mostly out of my paranoia that I needed to find a niche, any niche, no matter what, in order to focus my blog.

Yeah, I know – my blog! My fucking blog!

And to that extent, I’ve actually had one additional domain given to me to do something with, and another domain I bought – mostly because it was on sale for serious – and neither one has really inspired me with its design or purpose.

And then I stumbled across this blog, outlining the reasons why niches = bad, and personal bullshit blogs = good.

And it was sort of a revelation.

It’s my blog and I can whine if I want to.

So that decided me fairly solidly in my course of action. I’m going to just do what I do where I do it, which will be here. Logical rant against the system? Here. Sprawling analysis of Survivor? Here. Or even calling lesbians hypocritical in their sex toy usage? Monkey-fighting here, dillhole!

(I don’t mean that. Obviously you’re not a dillhole. I’m talking to that other dillhole, to your right.)

This allows me to write about whatever, whenever I want. I’ve stopped being concerned about finding a niche – apparently, I have none. I am nicheless. And I find I am fine with that. I can write random ideas out, and hopefully have the common theme be entertainment.

I can continue to update the “Argue Fu” project (now found under the above tab “The Mission”), or add stories to the growing tales of the Jones Files (now appropriately under “The Legend”). And when the occasional podcast strikes my fancy, you guessed it, it’s under “The Podcast”.

Since I’ve missed the opportunity to blog about the Oscars, the season so far of the Amazing Race and Survivor, and even going at length about Lost, I won’t bemoan the missed chances.

I have to just maintain the new mantra: “I just don’t give a shit”.

Seriously? A Code?

So, yesterday, in my regular perusing of various RSS feeds, which include a multitude of personal blogs, I see in one blog’s sidebar the cryptic little notation that references a “Blogger’s Code of Conduct”.

‘Hey!’ I think. ‘I’m a blogger! Perhaps I should investigate this Code, and decide if it is something that I should be cozying to as well!’

(I don’t actually talk like that to myself, but it certainly makes me sound more upbeat than the bitter rage-cookie I tend to be.)

So, I go take a look at this Code of Conduct, which is apparently supposed to serve as an inspiration for Bloggers who should maintain civility whilst making their point. Except, that’s only the first problem I have with this so-called ‘Code’. I don’t believe that civility is a built in, default option type of situation. But, before I am absolutely dismissive, let me see what I should be doing here…

More >

Test the Nation

The Studio...impressive, no?Well, my wife won out on the TV watching last night, since no way was I going to argue with a woman 9 months pregnant. We watched a lovely 2 hour piece of television called "Test the Nation". For those readers of an American ilk, it simply is a trivia test, consisting of 60 questions which covered a range of topics, all concerned with the new millennium.

Although, to be fair, they admit that the judges decided arbitrarily that the millennium started January 1st, 2000. So, geeks, argue amongst yourselves.

Now, I do love a good test of my knowledge. And this show was set up in an interesting way: 6 teams of 36 people each, organized by their one common element. That meant we had the Flight Crew (people having to do with air travel like pilots, Air Force and flight attendants), Backpackers (yes, young people who travel the world by foot), Cab Drivers (but we're including limo drivers, and water taxi drivers), Chefs (bizarrely including Bob Blumer, the Surreal Gourmet), Bloggers (which made my wife turn to me and ask "Honey, why aren't you there?") and finally, and most confusingly, Celebrity Impersonators.

Each team had a celebrity to represent them. And I mean a real celebrity, although mainly by Canadian standards, so some of these won't translate over to an American audience as "celebrities". There was Carlo Rota (24, Boondock Saints, Little Mosque on the Prairie) for the Chefs, Debbie Travis (um, the painting chick from England) for the Backpackers, Tricia Helfer (Battlestar Galactica, Canada's Top Model) for the Flight Crew, Farley Flex (Canadian Idol judge…yeah, I don't know him either), Lorne Cardinal (Davis from Corner Gas) for the Cabbies, and finally, my personal fave, Samantha Bee from the Daily Show for the Bloggers.

The show, sadly, was incredibly badly hosted by two people you will never have heard of unless you spend a lot of time watching CBC news programs, and listening to CBC radio. I do neither. These hosts were horribly uncharismatic, and made the show incredibly hard to watch. I love how the male host would suck the life out of the competition periodically by popping in to inform the teams who was doing the worst. And he would literally say, "Yes, Cab Drivers, you're in last place. What do you think of that?"

Canada's own Samantha BeeThe test itself actually had some difficulty to it. If you want to see it, try here.

Yes, I got into the test, and my wife and I did it as a team. We managed 51 out of 60, which isn't bad. The best celebrity score was Samantha Bee, with 49. I assume her knowledge of politics, popular trends and technology has to be good based on her work on the Daily Show, which keeps her cutting edge. And, without any surprise for me, the Bloggers team came in first with an average score of 50 out of 60 (although the highest scoring individual in the entire thing was this guy, who got an incredible 57 out of 60). I suspected that people who write the most, would have to do the most research, in order not to appear idiotic.

What I enjoyed the most about the show, though, were the little updates about all the people doing the test online along with the show (which we didn't do, seeing as we would rather lounge on the couch to watch). Some interesting facts:

  • As I suspected, women did better than men. (I know women are more evolved than men)
  • Central Canada, (wherever that counts as…I suspect we're in it) did better than either coast.
  • The highest scoring age group were people in their 30's
  • TV watchers did worse than people who don't watch a lot of TV, but internet users did better than people who are rarely on the internet. Those two seem to contradict each other.
  • My favourite stat: Vegetarians did worse than carnivores.

See? I've always suspected that meat made you smarter. After all, you're more likely to eat actual brains than a vegetarian.

Oh, and I totally nailed the pet related question. Thanks, Super Pet.